Nerman Fatic vs Peter Torebko Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Wojtek Kolan

HEAD TO HEAD

N. Fatic vs P. Torebko

Nerman Fatic
Nerman Fatic

Flag BIH BIH

w
w
w
l
w
w
l
w
l
l
Peter Torebko
Peter Torebko

Flag GER GER

l
w
w
w
l
w
w
l
l
l

1

Win

1

Played

0

Win

31
Age
37
6'3" (191 cm)
Height
6'1" (185 cm)
214
C. Rank
677
191
Best Rank
182
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$74.0K
Career Money
$28.9K
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed

Head-to-head: Fatic 1 - 0 Torebko

They have played 3 sets in total, with Nerman Fatic winning 2 and Peter Torebko winning 1. The last match between Nerman Fatic and Peter Torebko was at the Italy F34 (Santa Margherita Di Pula), 01-11-2018, Round: QF, Surface: Clay, with Nerman Fatic getting the victory 6-4 0-6 6-2.

PlayersHead To Head Match Wins
Fatic1
Torebko0
Last 1 H2H Matches:

(QFItaly F34 (Santa Margherita Di Pula)(11-01-18)

Clay
BIH Flag
Nerman Fatic
6
0
6
GER Flag
Peter Torebko
4
6
2

N. Fatic vs P. Torebko H2H Profile

Stats
$73,995Career Prize Money$28,860
58.49% (403-286)Career Total W/L58.89% (497-347)
1Clay0
12Titles13
1Total H2H Matches0
0.00% (0-1)YTD Win/Loss0% (0-0)

N. Fatic vs P. Torebko Match Preview:

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nerman Fatic has won 43.74% of points on their second serve, while Peter Torebko has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nerman Fatic, in recent form, has won 45.45% of their opponent's second serve points, while Peter Torebko has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.89% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Nerman Fatic has saved 53.75% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Peter Torebko has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Nerman Fatic has won 75.00% of matches played (W/L 51/17), with Peter Torebko winning 0% (W/L 0/1) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Nerman Fatic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 341/218), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/2). Peter Torebko has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 367/230), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 29% (W/L 2/5).
  • Player level: In the last year, Nerman Fatic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 64.86% of matches (W/L 24/13), where as Peter Torebko has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 0.00% of matches (W/L 0/1). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
  • Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Nerman Fatic winning 1 times and Peter Torebko being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Nerman Fatic winning 2 and Peter Torebko winning 1.
  • The last match between Nerman Fatic and Peter Torebko was at the Italy F34 (Santa Margherita Di Pula), 01-11-2018, Round: QF, Surface: Clay, with Nerman Fatic getting the victory 6-4 0-6 6-2.
  • Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:1:0.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nerman Fatic has played against opponents with an average rank of 345.6 while Peter Torebko has played against players with an average rank of 0.
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nerman Fatic has won 89% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Peter Torebko has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Nerman Fatic has converted 35.08% of breakpoint opportunities, and Peter Torebko has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Nerman Fatic vs Peter Torebko Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

N. Fatic vs P. Torebko H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

Stats
1H2H Matches Won0
2Sets Won1
12Games Won12
1Aces (Total)1
3Total Double Faults3
2:1:0Average Match Time2:1:0
73% (48/66)1st Serve %69% (54/78)
52% (25/48)1st Serve Win %52% (28/54)
33% (6/18)2nd Serve Win %46% (11/24)
58% (7/12)Break Pts Won %70% (7/10)
50% (39/78)Return Points Win %53% (35/66)
100% (1/1)Best‑of‑3 Win %0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)Deciding Set Win %0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)1st Set Won, Won Match0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)1st Set Won, Lost Match0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)1st Set Lost, Won Match0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

2nd Serve Win %: Fatic 52%, Torebko 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Fatic 54%, Torebko 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Fatic 61%, Torebko 0%.

N. Fatic Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
I.hardHelsinki Challenger - 03-11-2025

R1

FRAC. Hemery
L
6-3 7-6(4)
ClayM15 Bol - 20-10-2025

R2

SRBM. Miladinovic
L
7-6(2) ret.

R1

CROA. Voljavec
W
6-2 6-3
HardOlbia Challenger - 13-10-2025

QF

FRAH. Grenier
L
6-3 6-4

R2

ITAC. Alberto
W
3-6 6-3 6-3

P. Torebko Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
ClayM25 Ueberlingen - 18-08-2025

Q1

GERE. Julian
L
5-7 6-3 11-9
ClayM25+H Lesa - 23-08-2021

R1

ITAA. Picchione
L
6-4 6-2
ClayM25 Ueberlingen - 16-08-2021

R1

ESPJ. Fco.
L
6-1 6-2
ClayAll Lower level tournaments - 01-06-2020

R1

TURA. Celikbilek
W
7-6(5) 6-4

R1

ESTD. Glinka
W
4-6 6-4 6-3
banner

N. Fatic vs P. Torebko Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

Stats
58.49% (403/286)YTD Win/Loss58.89% (497/347)
57.51% (888/656)Sets Win/Loss56.38% (1118/865)
53.04% (7574/6706)Games Win/Loss52.75% (9891/8860)
51.19% (43/41)Hard Win/Loss47.37% (18/20)
61.00% (341/218)Clay Win/Loss61.47% (367/230)
43.18% (19/25)Indoor Hard W/L54.46% (110/92)
0.00% (0/2)Grass Win/Loss28.57% (2/5)
0.23Aces Per Game0.23
1568Aces Total2123
0.22Double Faults Per Game0.23
1510Total Double Faults2076
1:19:52Average Match Time1st Match
509.43Average Opponent Rank612.91
66% (23679/35628)1st Serve %56% (17852/31664)
65% (15504/23679)1st Serve Win %69% (12349/17852)
48% (5733/11949)2nd Serve Win %48% (6651/13822)
47% (1961/4201)Break Points Won % (Total)44% (1568/3603)
43% (15552/35990)Return Points Win %42% (13703/32418)
20.00% (1/4)Slam W/L37.50% (3/5)
0.00% (0/1)Masters W/L0.00% (0/1)
40.00% (4/6)Cups W/L0% (0/0)
25.00% (3/9)Main Tour W/L34.38% (11/21)
52.91% (118/105)Challenger W/L52.38% (121/110)
63.24% (277/161)Futures W/L63.29% (362/210)
60% (394/661)Best of 3 Sets Win %59% (490/833)
0% (0/3)Best of 5 Sets Win %50% (3/6)
51% (79/156)Tiebreaks Win % (Total)53% (131/247)
54% (102/188)Deciding Set Win %57% (168/293)
88% (393/347)1st Set Won, Won Match86% (463/396)
11% (393/42)1st Set Won, Lost Match14% (463/67)
19% (296/57)1st Set Lost, Won Match27% (381/101)

Other Tennis Predictions Today

07:00 PM 13/11/25
Prediction
FRAD. AddedLL
FRAK. Jacquet
W1
2.35
W2
1.51
08:00 PM 13/11/25
Prediction
ESPC. Taberner4
CZEZ. Kolar
W1
1.571
W2
2.22
02:30 PM 13/11/25
Prediction
FRAT. ParisWC
KAZM. Kukushkinq
W1
2.35
W2
1.51
12:00 AM 13/11/25
Prediction
HUNA. JillyWC
ESPA. Martinez
W1
5.3
W2
1.114
09:30 AM 13/11/25
Prediction
THAM. Jones
JPNS. Shimabukuro3
W1
3.94
W2
1.2
08:00 AM 13/11/25
Prediction
USAO. Crawford8
JPNK. Uchida
W1
1.48
W2
2.43

Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

12 Nov 2025

Jannik Sinner vs Alexander Zverev Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 12th November 2025 Best Bets

12 Nov 2025

Marco Cecchinato vs Mariano Navone Prediction – ATP Montevideo Challenger – 12th November 2025 Best Bets

12 Nov 2025

Gustavo Heide vs Emilio Nava Prediction – ATP Montevideo Challenger – 12th November 2025 Best Bets

12 Nov 2025

Jan-Lennard Struff vs Mark Lajal Prediction – ATP Lyon Challenger – 12th November 2025 Best Bets

12 Nov 2025

Ben Shelton vs Felix Auger Aliassime Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 12th November 2025 Best Bets

12 Nov 2025

Laslo Djere vs Tom Paris Prediction – ATP Lyon Challenger – 12th November 2025 Best Bets